Which is NOT a requisite for intervention by a non-party?

• A. Intervenor has legal interest in the matter in controversy.
• B. Intervenor's rights may not be fully protected in a separate proceeding.
• C. Intervenor must be financially interested in the outcome.
• D. Intervention will not unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication.

Answer: (C)

Intervention by a non-party is about protecting a person’s legitimate interest in the subject matter and ensuring their rights can be safeguarded within the case, not about whether they have a financial stake. The intervenor must show a legal interest in the matter or that their rights could be impaired by the outcome, and that without joining the case their interests may not be adequately protected. The court also requires that allowing the intervention won’t unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the case. A financial interest is not a prerequisite—someone can intervene to protect non-financial legal interests or rights. So, the statement that the intervenor must be financially interested is not a requisite.