Tony knows the facts but cannot recall; a written record is provided; he has never seen the writing before. Is the written record admissible as past recollection recorded?

• A. Yes, the writing is admissible as past recollection recorded because it was written down.
• B. No, it is not admissible because the witness never saw the writing and cannot recall.
• C. Yes, if the writing is introduced by the party who prepared it.
• D. No, unless the writing was made contemporaneously with the events.

Answer: (B)