In a criminal case, Atty. L offered an affidavit describing what he witnessed during the incident. The defense seeks cross-examination of him, claiming lawyer-client privilege. How should the court rule?

• A. Overruled; the subject disclosed in the affidavit is no longer privileged because it concerns what the counsel witnessed, not communications or advice in the professional capacity.
• B. Sustained; lawyer-client privilege covers all communications and is not waived by disclosure.
• C. Quashed; the entire cross-examination is barred.
• D. Granted; privilege protects both communications and observations.

Answer: (A)