In a controversy over extrajudicial foreclosure, a second case is filed seeking damages in addition to the void foreclosure. Will the second case be dismissed on lis pendens grounds?

• A. No, because lis pendens does not apply to future damages claims.
• B. Yes, the motion will prosper because lis pendens exists; both cases share the same cause of action.
• C. Yes, because damages change the cause of action and lis pendens applies.
• D. No, because the bank is a different defendant in the second case.

Answer: (B)