A witness testifies about similar incidents with a former employer to prove the defendant's habit of stealing. Under the res inter alios acta rule, this evidence is:

• A. Inadmissible because res inter alios acta bars it
• B. Admissible only to show that the person is lying
• C. Admissible to prove habit, custom, or usage; not as to a single prior act
• D. Admissible only to prove guilt by pattern

Answer: (C)